Procrastination (But I Digress)

Friday, September 11, 2009

Rain Delay

Well here it is--the promised response to the comments on my blog called Privilege. I was in Washington DC (of all places) for a training. It was a wonderful trip, but the internet was not free and I'm kind of miserly that way. A great shout out to my sisters who did a great job representing.

I heard a pundit describe the disconnect between liberals and conservatives in this country as both sides believe that 2 + 2 = 4 and that the other side believes that 2 + 2 = a duck. It is hard to compromise with someone who thinks that 2 + 2 = a duck. That's the best description that I have ever heard. Still it is hard to wrap my mind around the concept that there are people out there who think that I think 2 + 2 = a duck. To my mind, that is where the shouting comes in. My response to someone who acts like I think that 2 + 2 = a duck is to scream--"it's a 4 you *explitive*"

Shouting doesn't make a better argument, but it does release some of the frustration.

Uncle John had an illuminating comment. He was absolutely correct. I was speaking about health care and the legislation is about health insurance. But I would think that a conservative would approve of a public option for health insurance, because it is, in effect, a use tax. You can choose not to pay it and to have your own private insurance. It is not mandatory like medicare tax or social security tax. Are conservatives calling for an end to medicare and social security--both socialist programs and both slated to be seriously short of money over the next 20 years such that the "tax" will not cover the cost? [Uncle John, thanks for the e-mail with the link to specific problems in the health care bill--I wish that I had time to go through all of the points, but all I can do is hope that my congressman does. My impression of a bill in congress is that it is made up like saugage--it's not perfect. My feeling is that these provisions come from other legislation that works, like medicare or a state plan, but I don't have time to research it further.]

I agree that the health care bill is not perfect and before the President's speech I believed that anything short of a bill including a public option was fatally flawed. But health care is in crisis and we must address it. [I debated sharing my own horror stories of dealing with the complexity of obtaining health care and my own insurance woes, but I think Gretchen highlighted the issues really well in her comment.]

Yes, Aunt Pat, I am so in love with President Obama, but my eyes are wide open. I am wise enough to understand that my adoration is the result of excellant packaging (gosh, he's cute and so smart!). I fully expect some terrible flaw to be revealed, because we are all human beings, no matter what expectations are built around us. I hope the terrible flaw is not a sex scandal--I've become somewhat of a prude in my old spinster age. I do hope that the terrible flaw will be a money scandal--that's as American as apple pie.

Human beings, I must keep reminding myself are not perfect. There's good and bad in everyone. Keep talking. 2 + 2 = 4. I'll try not to shout and I'll try to back up my statement with facts. The President's speech did that. He laid out concrete reforms that are needed. Yes, they are not free (he's leaning toward a plan with no public option, but that requires all of us to purchase insurance--I have no idea how uninsured people can possibly afford that), but our choice of doing nothing or doing a little bit at a time is not a realistic choice. I'm not willing to sit in my ivy covered tower while other people suffer. This is not really altruistic, I know that I am one illness away from being bankrupt and uninsurable myself under the current laws. My health insurance is very expensive and it stinks. Adrienne had a blog about dealing with health care with no insurance. My own experience with health insurance wasn't all that. It is time to act congress.

Meanwhile, I'm holding my breath for my Nadal. I hope he is so rich that he doesn't need to worry about health insurance. Gonzo is enough of a threat. And who will I root for between Kim and Serena. Maybe a little rain is not so bad.

5 Comments:

  • At September 12, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Blogger EZ Travel said…

    I did read through email that Uncle John sent including the link. And I see the duck clearly on the other side.

    I did not analyze each point, because I have a real job and this is not what they pay me for.

    I did read through all of the points and this is my favorite duck-like line: Page 489 Sec 1308: "The Govt will cover marriage and family therapy. (Which means Govt will insert itself into your marriage even.)"

    How on earth can this be interpreted as the government inserting itself into your marriage? Does it say you will be required to attend marriage and family therapy? NO! It says we understand this is an important thing for those that need it and we will cover it. Why is that bad?

    This is another one of my favorites: Page 427 Lines 15-24: "The Govt mandates a program for orders on "end-of-life." (The Govt has a say in how your life ends!)"

    This must be the famous death panels. I have read this section and what it says is that doctors must consult with their patients about end-of-life care. The patient can decide that everything possible must be done to save them. But the point is that doctors should not avoid this conversation. It is not a pleasant conversation topic, but it is something that doctor’s, who are the best people to give the patient information on possible scenarios and possible outcomes, need to be doing. It absolutely DOES NOT say that the government has a say in how your life ends. Quack, quack!

    I went through a lot of the points and read the related sections of the document, and each one was mis-interpreted (accidentally? on purpose?) I am certainly glad Dr. Fraser is not my doctor, I wouldn't want him interpreting my chart and noticing that I secretly want to be a duck. I don't think my insurance would cover that.

     
  • At September 14, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Blogger Sean M. said…

    That was a great response, Erika. Smart as a whip that girl...

    I want to share something that a very wise person told me recently. She said that we support the uninsured whether we get a public option or not. The uninsured are given health care no matter if they can pay for it or not (with some restrictions, I'm sure).

    BUT, what are we paying for? We are paying for emergency room visits, emergency surgeries, and long recoveries. All very expensive things.

    What this very wise person suggested was that people could be covered in order to get preventive care, much less expensive. Yes, tax-payers and those with insurance or the means to cover their own medical expenses would be paying for much of it, but isn't paying for preventive care better than paying for expensive last-minute treatments?

    What's the old saying? "An ounce of prevention equals a pound of cure"??? This applies to health care as well. Covering those uninsured people under a public plan would do just that: it would get people in to see doctors NOW to avoid costly procedures LATER.

    This very wise person has worked in health care for 25+ years. Who is this wise person, you ask? My very own mother; smart as a whip, that girl...

     
  • At September 15, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    If you would like to pay for someone else's healthcare, preventative or emergency, there are already avenues set up for that called charities. If you can not find one that serves your need to donate please feel free to send the money directly to me. I will make sure that the lady who just asked me for a dollar gets a check up.
    **There really is a need for a sarcasm font. See if we can get a Font Czar on that pronto! ;)
    -Tracy

     
  • At September 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Blogger KathrynVH said…

    See there, liberals and conservatives can agree on something--we really do need a sarcasm font.

     
  • At September 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I love that! We are SOOOO funny! :)
    Tracy

     

Post a Comment

<< Home